Yes, renaming the file to ppc instead of pcc does seem more correct. --Andrew Whitworth
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, James E Keenan <[email protected]> wrote: > This file is one of several which is found only in the threads branch. It > describes its purpose as follows: > > * This header provides an implementation of atomic > * operations on PowerPC platforms with GCC-style > * inline assembly suppport. > > Given that, why isn't the file's basename 'gcc_ppc.h'? And shouldn't 'pcc' > be changed to 'ppc' in these locations? > > $ ack -i pcc include/parrot/atomic/gcc_pcc.h > /* atomic/gcc_pcc.h > include/parrot/atomic/gcc_pcc.h > #ifndef PARROT_ATOMIC_GCC_PCC_H_GUARD > #define PARROT_ATOMIC_GCC_PCC_H_GUARD > #endif /* PARROT_ATOMIC_GCC_PCC_H_GUARD */ > > Thank you very much. > Jim Keenan > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
