#380: t/pmc/exceptionhandler.t - Bad plan. You planned 8 tests but ran 6
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mikehh | Type: bug
Status: reopened | Priority: normal
Milestone: | Component: core
Version: trunk | Severity: medium
Resolution: | Keywords: pmc
Lang: | Patch:
Platform: |
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mikehh):
The original reported problem now seems to have cleared up.
'''However''' my build without the optimize flag is failing t/dynpmc/foo.t
03
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/18419
as opposed to my build with --optimize which passes that test
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/18415
both builds fail t/pmc/packfileconstanttable.t (failed test 3), but then
so are the other smoke tests at the moment
I did a make realclean, perl Configure.pl, make, make test and the test
failed.
I then did a new svn co, perl Configure.pl, make, make smoke and the test
failed. That is smoke test 18419 at r37050.
None of the other smoke tests seem to fail this test.
I am running on Kubuntu Intrepid i386 with all recent updates and the same
for CPAN. It does not fail the test on Kubuntu Intrepid AMD64 either.
I can't think of any settings that would cause this, or what I could have
done that would cause the test to pass when I run perl Configure
--optimise as opposed to perl Configure.pl
I have included the prove results for the tests without the optimize and
with.
{{{
m...@mhk-desktop:~/parrot.nopt$ prove --verbose t/dynpmc/foo.t
t/dynpmc/foo.t ..
1..9
ok 1 - get_integer
ok 2 - loadlib with relative pathname, no ext
not ok 3 - loadlib with absolute pathname, no ext
# Failed test 'loadlib with absolute pathname, no ext'
# at t/dynpmc/foo.t line 57.
# Exited with error code: 1
# Received:
# Class 'Foo' not found
# current instr.: 'main' pc 16
(/home/mhk/parrot.nopt/t/dynpmc/foo_3.pir:15)
#
# Expected:
# 42
#
ok 4 - loadlib with relative pathname & ext
ok 5 - loadlib with absolute pathname & ext
ok 6 - inherited add
ok 7 - Foo subclass isa Integer
ok 8 - .HLL 1
ok 9 - .HLL 2
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 9.
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/9 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/dynpmc/foo.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 9 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 0.20 cusr
0.14 csys = 0.39 CPU)
Result: FAIL
m...@mhk-desktop:~/parrot.nopt$
}}}
{{{
m...@mhk-desktop:~/parrot$ prove --verbose t/dynpmc/foo.t
t/dynpmc/foo.t ..
1..9
ok 1 - get_integer
ok 2 - loadlib with relative pathname, no ext
ok 3 - loadlib with absolute pathname, no ext
ok 4 - loadlib with relative pathname & ext
ok 5 - loadlib with absolute pathname & ext
ok 6 - inherited add
ok 7 - Foo subclass isa Integer
ok 8 - .HLL 1
ok 9 - .HLL 2
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.21 cusr
0.12 csys = 0.38 CPU)
Result: PASS
m...@mhk-desktop:~/parrot$
}}}
I have no idea at the moment how to proceed here. I will keep working on
it.
As regards this ticket the original problem I reported seems to have gone
away.
Should a new ticket be created?
Has anybody else had a problem in this area?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/380#comment:8>
Parrot <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/>
Parrot Development
_______________________________________________
parrot-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-tickets
