#1272: Problems with codetest on files in ext/ directory (should ext/ be 
included
in codetest?)
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  mikehh   |       Owner:       
     Type:  RFC      |      Status:  new  
 Priority:  normal   |   Milestone:       
Component:  testing  |     Version:  1.7.0
 Severity:  medium   |    Keywords:       
     Lang:           |       Patch:       
 Platform:           |  
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
 I have recently been getting codetest failures with
 t/codingstd/pod_syntax.t in ext/nqp-rx

 I did fix the files in question (redundant =cut at the end) but found that
 there were a whole bunch of trailing spaces that my editor removed on
 saving the file that were not picked up by the trailing spaces test.

 Subsequent commits to that directory did not include the fixes I made and
 I was required to redo the fixes.

 The situation is that we should either run all codingstd tests on the
 files in the ext directory or none.

 We should bear in mind that the files in the ext directory are external to
 parrot.

 pmichaud++ stated that the files are generated and that it would be
 difficult to fix the generator to prevent the generation of trailing
 spaces.

 also:

 <pmichaud> mikehh: imo, we shouldn't be running codetest on things in
 ext/[[BR]]
 <pmichaud> mikehh: if you're editing the files in ext/nqp-rx, it won't do
 much good -- they get overwritten by newer versions


 The problem is that the fixes are not 'permanent' and the next time the
 code is committed to parrot, if the fixes have not been included upstream
 the failure re-occurs.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1272>
Parrot <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/>
Parrot Development
_______________________________________________
parrot-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-tickets

Reply via email to