On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:39:04AM -0000, Parrot wrote: > My thought was that the PCT language all support --target= and --output= > (along with some others) so adding support for -L (--bytecode-load-path=?) > might make sense at the same level.
Yes, in this context I'm more inclined to add a -L option of some sort. We also need to review/reconsider the command-line option processing proposed for Perl 6 in S19 (which provides a syntax for passing options to individual stages of a program). Pm _______________________________________________ parrot-tickets mailing list [email protected] http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-tickets
