On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 08:52:21AM +0800, Vasily Chekalkin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:35 AM, chromatic <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday 20 August 2010 at 18:15, Parrot wrote: > > > >> I'm not sure why it chooses to use line buffering -- it seems like > >> some other strategy would be far more efficient. > > > > Agreed, but in browsing the IO code I haven't seen an easy way to specify > > "Don't read line by line" or an IO function to perform the STRING > > concatenation at the C level, which won't allocate lots of temporary > > immutable > > STRINGs. > > What about switching to use StringBuilder internally?
Wouldn't StringBuilder still require lots of intermediate strings to be used as input to the StringBuilder? Pm _______________________________________________ parrot-tickets mailing list [email protected] http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-tickets
