#2030: t/pmc/structview.t fails with memory PANIC
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  doughera  |       Owner:       
     Type:  bug       |      Status:  new  
 Priority:  normal    |   Milestone:       
Component:  none      |     Version:  3.1.0
 Severity:  medium    |    Keywords:       
     Lang:            |       Patch:       
 Platform:  linux     |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 As of RELEASE_3_1_0-329-geb0ebb2 the t/pmc/structview.t test fails on
 Linux/386 with:
 {{{
 1..16
 ok 1 - 8 bits in one byte
 ok 2 - single byte is byte-aligned
 ok 3 - byte-aligned single byte is single byte when aligned
 ok 4 - allocate an instance
 ok 5 - bitpattern gives correct byte
 ok 6 - unaligned struct first byte
 ok 7 - unaligned struct second byte
 Failed allocation of 3219616584 bytes
 Parrot VM: PANIC: Out of mem!
 C file src/gc/alloc_memory.c, line 87
 Parrot file (not available), line (not available)

 We highly suggest you notify the Parrot team if you have not been working
 on
 Parrot.  Use parrotbug (located in parrot's root directory) or send an
 e-mail to [email protected].
 Include the entire text of this error message and the text of the script
 that
 generated the error.  If you've made any modifications to Parrot, please
 describe them as well.

 Version     : 3.1.0-devel
 Configured  : Sat Feb 26 19:51:13 2011 GMT
 Architecture: i386-linux
 Interp Flags: (no interpreter)
 Exceptions  : (missing from core)

 Dumping Core...
 Sorry, coredump is not yet implemented for this platform.
 }}}

 This was compiled with gcc-4.3.2 with no optimization, but changing the
 optimization level (or even the compiler) didn't make any significant
 difference.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/2030>
Parrot <https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/>
Parrot Development
_______________________________________________
parrot-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-tickets

Reply via email to