On 03/05/18 16:57, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:56:33AM +0200, Sebastian Parschauer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I get the feeling that the current upstreaming process doesn't really >> work. Already acked patches stay uncommitted for long time and new >> patches stay without a comment. >> >> What about moving upstream parted to GitHub so that it is easier found >> and we can better keep track of current upstream bugs and queued patches >> in pull requests? > I'd be happy with that. Everything else I do is on GitHub, and while I > was originally reluctant to make the switch from email based patch > review I've gotten used to it. There are other benefits as well, eg. > automating tests for new PRs (assuming we could get Travis to cooperate > with the parted test suite). > > Sorry about the slow responses from me, things have been very busy > lately. > Looking forward to the migration. If you want anyone to do some travis/CI work, I'm helping out with the kernel-CI project over at Gentoo linux using buildbot currently, and hoping to transfer some arm stage-building to a similar platform by the end of the year (2018) also, time permitting! Regards,
Michael Everitt.
