On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 01:46:20PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:52:41AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > I don't see anything wrong on my end. I use mutt and 'list-reply' which
> > picks the list address. Some people use 'reply-all' which ends up adding
> > the list and your email address so you may get it twice in those cases?
> > 
> > My expectation is that discussions remain on the list, and anyone who
> > cares to follow it will be subscribed, so replying to the list is the
> > correct thing to do.
> 
> You've misunderstood the problem, I'm afraid.  Compare the headers of
> these two emails, the second of which was a reply to the former:
> 
>   Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:50:03 +0200
>   From: Alberto Planas Dominguez <[email protected]>
>   To: [email protected]
>   Subject: [parted-devel] Printing partition type in --machine output
>   Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> 
>   Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:13:18 -0700
>   From: "Brian C. Lane" <[email protected]>
>   To: [email protected], 
> [email protected]
>   Subject: Re: [parted-devel] Printing partition type in --machine output
>   Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> 
> List domains changing can often be a bit of a problem.  I think you must
> have a stray "lists [email protected]" or "subscribe
> [email protected]" in your .muttrc.  Replacing that
> with the corresponding @alioth-lists.debian.net should fix the problem.

Ah! Yes, I had forgotten I had that in there. I'm not seeing the
Followup-To header that Jan mentioned though. I'm not sure where that's
coming from.

-- 
Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT)

Reply via email to