Brian C. Lane writes:

> Wow, so you're using > 128 partitions?

I wonder about that as well.  Also how does printing the number help?

> In theory GPT can support more, but parted doesn't have any way to
> create them so we've never needed to display that.
>
> Thanks for the patch, but it would break anything parsing the output,
> and for something as unusual as this I don't think we want to do that.

Anything parsing the output should be parsing the machine parsable
version, where new fields can be added at the end without breaking
existing parsers.

Reply via email to