"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello folks, > > I just happened to notice that the names of some of the functions, > like the ones used to register/unregister file-systems and > disk-labels, do not follow a similar pattern. eg., > ped_register_disk_type & ped_file_system_type_register, etc.. Maybe we > should gradually make sure that names follow a uniform pattern. > > In certain places there is some unnecessary repetition of code. eg., > the functions for registering/unregistering file-system types and > disk-label types perform the identical functions; the probe functions > are also similar in some cases. Maybe we should try remove some of > these repetitions in the near future. > > What do you think?
All this changes should be done for 2.0 release. Not for 1.8. Also because we don't want to diverge a lot in API from previous releases. Would be great if you could get darcs and make one branch just for API clean-up. I would suggest you to read some links: - http://darcs.net/DarcsWiki/GettingStarted - http://www.carpetcode.org/work-with-darcs.html - http://zwiki.org/DarcsRepos To make the branch, it's very trivial, just do: $: darcs get https://viridian-project.de/darcs/parted/ parted-api-cleanup -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
