Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Checking what there's available for C I found "Check"[1][2]. It looks
>> interesting for me.
>
> I've done a little unit testing for C applications before, and I used
> CuTest[1], which is a really really simple library. However, I think
> Check might be a better option because it runs in a separate address
> space that allows us to catch assertion errors and segmentation
> faults.
I saw it when I was googling for it. Yes, but there's also another
ones that does the same. The good thing about check is it doesn't use
glib or other libraries so it's smaller.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
