On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:10:09PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> Is the ext2 resize code in the master branch or the parted-1.8.x
> branch? I'm releasing off the 1.8.x branch and if the new ext2 is in
> master, it shouldn't matter.
Both, it's from 1.7.
The change is trivial, I have attached a patch against ext2_resize.c .
Leslie
--
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
diff --git a/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c b/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c
index 54899f7..bf8548c 100644
--- a/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c
+++ b/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_resize.c
@@ -687,20 +687,14 @@ int ext2_resize_fs(struct ext2_fs *fs, b
fs->metadirty |= EXT2_META_SB;
}
- if (!ext2_determine_itoffset(fs) && ped_exception_throw (
- PED_EXCEPTION_WARNING,
- PED_EXCEPTION_OK_CANCEL,
- _("A resize operation on this file system will "
- "use EXPERIMENTAL code\n"
- "that MAY CORRUPT it (although it hasn't done"
- "so yet\n"
- "in the past).\n"
- "You should at least backup your data and "
- "run 'e2fsck -f' afterwards."))
- == PED_EXCEPTION_CANCEL)
- {
- return 0;
- }
+ if (!ext2_determine_itoffset(fs))
+ ped_exception_throw (
+ PED_EXCEPTION_NO_FEATURE,
+ PED_EXCEPTION_OK,
+ _("GNU Parted cannot resize this file system, please use"
+ "resize2fs."));
+
+ return 0;
if (fs->opt_verbose)
fprintf(stderr, "ext2_resize_fs\n");
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
