Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Do you mean the FAT_TYPE_FAT12 case *is* a "should not happen" case?
>> Are you sure? If so, I'll be happy to add the following for all of those:
>>
>> case FAT_TYPE_FAT12:
>> PED_ASSERT (0, (void) 0);
>> break;
>
> I checked both the parted fat source and the linux fat source and
> hadn't identified what's the right values to put for FAT12 hence I
> think we might raise an exception instead of continue to work in that
> case. Doing that would allow us to know if someone tries to use parted
> in this specific case or not.
Ignore this part since you already found the right information.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
