On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:20 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Two examples:
> >> ==========================================
> >>
> >> static int
> >> _test_code_bad (const FatTable* ft, FatCluster code)
> >> {
> >> switch (ft->fat_type) {
> >> case FAT_TYPE_FAT16:
> >> if (code == 0xfff7) return 1;
> >> break;
> >>
> >> case FAT_TYPE_FAT32:
> >> if (code == 0x0ffffff7) return 1;
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> return 0;
> >> }
>
> Thanks again for the pointers.
>
> > Add:
> >
> > case FAT_TYPE_FAT12:
> > if (code == 0xff0) return 1;
>
> Hmm...
> it looks like doc/FAT is saying to use 0xff7 there:
>
> * bad cluster (0xff7 for FAT12, 0xfff7 for FAT16, 0x0ffffff7 for FAT32).
> Indicates the disk is physically damaged where the cluster is stored.Yep, my mistake. Sorry about that. -- David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Red Hat / Westford, MA
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
