On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 17:10 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, May 14, Jim Meyering wrote: > > > It may well be perfect, but it'd also be a lot easier for people to > > evaluate if you can say or show how parted malfunctions without > > your patch. Ideally, your patch would add a test case, but if you > > aren't inclined, someone here will write it. > > I'm hoping you can help out a little more... > > The userinterface was changed without notice. > This change restores the old userinterface.
Yes, the linux-swap change was unintentional. This was a mistake due to my misunderstanding and hatred of the git version control system. Apparently a number of releases I did never got pushed to the central repository and at one point, I recloned the repository and drove over local changes. We are working on this disaster at the moment. -- David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Red Hat / Westford, MA
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
