Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> test also on the library unittesting so we can know if the library
>> isn't broken again too...
>>
>> Can you try?
>
> That would not be a good way to spend my limited time.
>
> Besides, why bother?
> The above test exercises the affected code already, and since no one
> will be changing the public command-line interface any time soon,
> it should be more than enough to keep the bug from resurfacing.
I personally don't like to have integration tests only from basic
things. This specific case is handled by the library and then I think
we ought to have tests for it too.
That's why I asked you for doing it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
