Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> --- a/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_mkfs.c
>> +++ b/libparted/fs/ext2/ext2_mkfs.c
>> @@ -589,6 +590,7 @@ struct ext2_fs *ext2_mkfs(struct ext2_dev_handle *handle,
>> fs_too_small = 1;
>>
>> if (fs_too_small) {
>> + diagnose_fs_too_small:
>> ped_exception_throw (
>> PED_EXCEPTION_ERROR,
>> PED_EXCEPTION_CANCEL,
>
> Isn't the label wrongly indented?
That's how emacs indents it for me.
To be honest, I don't really care much at all
about indentation here, when there are still big blocks
of code with *no* or inconsistent indentation.
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/t3000-constraints.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> <...>
>> +test_expect_success \
>> + 'normalize the actual output' \
>> + 'sed "s,
>> *
>> ,,;s, $,," out > o2 && mv -f o2 out'
>> +
> <...>
>
> Looks like a line break. Is it right?
There are ^M bytes in there, so it might look strange,
but there's no problem with the patch.
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
