On 9/4/07, Frodo Baggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/07, Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like removing all of the ifdef'd-out cruft, but not the change
> > that sets MALLOC_CHECK_ in the environment.
> > MALLOC_CHECK_ is system specific, and besides, libraries (even when
> > compiled in debug mode) shouldn't be setting environment variables.
> I have reverted that commit with another that only removes the ifdef'd
> malloc debugging code.
>

Another...

>From 67785362337ef49f0041010c98f1c1f7c14c1b52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frodo Baggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 19:38:24 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] removing comments related to removed malloc debugging code

---
 libparted/libparted.c |    5 -----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libparted/libparted.c b/libparted/libparted.c
index 8b0fb5a..3e9aae4 100644
--- a/libparted/libparted.c
+++ b/libparted/libparted.c
@@ -40,11 +40,6 @@

 const PedArchitecture* ped_architecture;

-/* ped_malloc() debugging.  Stick the address and size of memory blocks that
- * weren't ped_free()d in here, and an exception will be thrown when it is
- * allocated.  That way, you can find out what, exactly, the allocated thing
- * is, and where it is created.
- */
 typedef struct
 {
     void*      pointer;
--
1.4.3.4

_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel

Reply via email to