Well, really, I'm pretty sure that what you describe is what parted does now: TheMBR is effectively a "dummy". The EFI specs, which are where GPT is defined, state that there will be an MBR and that it will have (if I remember...), exactly one entry, the "protective partition" which covers the entire disk so that non-GPT-aware tools won't treat the disk as blank. This so far is not really a hybrid scheme, it's how GPT is supposed to work. Any GPT-aware OS or program is supposed to use the GPT entries and ignore the MBR ones.
True "hybrid" GPT/MBR partitioning schemes are basically an informal hack, and the gptsync program is the operative definition of what they are and how they work. They were created to allow non-GPT-aware versions of Windows to boot from devices with non-MBR-aware firmware; namely, Intel Macs. The MBR therefore exists solely for Windows's benefit, and there's no reason it strictly has to reflect every partition that the GPT does, but that's the idea right now. Since GPT can have arbitrarily many entries whereas MBR is strictly limited to four, it's not really clear what Parted's role in this should be... While people are paying attention, I'd like to just point out another GPT issue, which is that as things stand there is no way I'm aware of to use parted to correct a broken GPT table which has an invalid uuid for the type of one partition. I never saw any response to my email on this topic a couple weeks ago. :) I did already write a tool to do that, but it would be great if the functionality could be rolled into parted... On Dec 23, 2007 5:40 PM, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Davis wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 02:27:57PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Matt Davis wrote: > >>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:16:21PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>>> Is there any sane way to support GPT-MBR hybrid partitioning in > parted? > >>>> This is required for booting on BIOS-based machines (the standard > MBR > >>>> handover protocol doesn't really work for GPT), but GPT is needed to > >>>> support > 2 TB. > >>>> > >>>> At least /boot should be in the MBR; some "other OSes" may need their > >>>> boot partition MBR-side as well. > >>> hpa, > >>> While I do not have an answer for you, I have been working, in my free > >>> time, to > >>> try to allow Parted to convert from one partition table type to > another, > >>> such as > >>> gpt to mbr, or vice versa. > >>> > >> Well, the hybrid is really another partitioning scheme, in many ways. > >> It's a little different than either. > > > > Yep, I am not familiar with that. However, I did notice the opportunity > to keep > > people up-to-date with what is going on regarding similar issue. > > > > The idea with hybrid partition is that you have both a GPT and an MBR. > The MBR has the boot partition(s), or possibly all partitions below 2 > TB, plus a "protective partition" (type 0xEE); the GPT has the other ones. > > -hpa > > _______________________________________________ > parted-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel > -- Dan Knapp "An infallible method of conciliating a tiger is to allow oneself to be devoured." (Konrad Adenauer)
_______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
