"Matt Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim, et all > I took another peek. It should not be too much work to roll this > history change into parted and out from the library. Unfortunately > that would require a global instance of a history manager, as I cannot > bind a manager pointer in with any other library structures, such as > the PedDevice which previously contained a pointer to the history > manager. I do not want to muck with the command callback routines > (do_<xxxxx>), so a global singleton seems the most logical. If that > is cool I will continue in that direction. I only want to implement > this if it will be deemed useful. I believe it is useful, but I value > the opinion of yourself and the rest of the parted team over my > opinion.
Hi Matt, Not quite sure what you're suggesting... However, adding a global variable is acceptable only if no library code uses it. _______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
