==13891== 80 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14 of 35 ==13891== at 0x40214E5: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149) ==13891== by 0x80D6884: ped_malloc (libparted.c:234) ==13891== by 0x81165CB: _disk_sync_part_table (linux.c:2216) ==13891== by 0x8116EEC: linux_disk_commit (linux.c:2514) ==13891== by 0x80D8B23: ped_disk_commit_to_os (disk.c:445)
int* rets = ped_malloc(sizeof(int) * last); (linux.c:2216) On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:10 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > Mike Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > > > I am the person who created ticket 47 > > http://parted.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/47 > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for reporting that. > Can you reproduce the leak with the latest from git? > > >>From the git source code, I could see that you have fixed many memory > > leaks. Do you know the release plan of 1.8.9? > > I am writing a daemon which depends on libparted 1.8.7, and there are > > many memory leaks in this version. > > We've been discussing making a release, and it may be > within the next couple of months. No set date yet, though. > > Is your daemon code freely available? > I'd like to start maintaining a list of projects that use parted. > -- Mike Hwang http://www.iqstor.com Phone: 62974477-612
_______________________________________________ parted-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
