-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2013 2:54 AM, Nageswara R Sastry wrote: > While trying to add partition 'disk.c: ped_disk_get_partition' > called, it internally calls 'disk.c: ped_disk_next_partition', this > function does not know about implicit partition so returns 'NULL'.
Right, *that* is the real problem. Fix that and the blkpg code should do the right thing. > My last year patches to parted, added code in labels/dasd.c to take > care of creating implicit partition. Due to the above mentioned > reason needed BLKRRPRT. It looks like this patch was not applied. If it were, and ped_disk_next_partition returned the implicit partition, then both parted print and the blkpg code should already do the right thing. > With the following patches & fixes, parted print shows the > implicit partition. > > Introducing the support of EAV and EDEV devices. > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/UeqtKA5pFJY6CbWBM8Gg > > And some more fixes to them [1], > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-09/msg00009.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-09/msg00017.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-09/msg00011.html These still have not been applied. Are you saying that when you apply them, your patch isn't needed? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSb7pXAAoJEJrBOlT6nu750G4H/ArF9poGUVZaCojri79UhrtL 01jtPxIhtRo/fXrZvArORlqvfWhv1PyDDi/9oqtNeb1jPgbTxIvU/fdDRPRXTsF8 oIVvf3etEQ102KK9ki7SIDFEXy2lqytu4TVLTpAXFYacoPaq3nzRNhKfZ4BosLeL rpxmxobX4PfryfjXI3woTu2k7n/tY2mQ8GYg6ZwduJlouejdp1bbhu2oXbFK8fFf eW2Eu04Wn6yltsjCCW0EEDsrnH2rGQWxbl2LI2BYcw+NazYVjeXaD4JgwbllUNcn zBvEx1uUpsa1Xol6xWCO6X+wodOnAOhzwbyGRsmL2E7frN8a0h448n0ceLUeSPw= =uJb7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
