Hi,
While rebasing the Debian patch stack to 3.2, I noticed that, even
though http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16338 removed the
logical-sector-size-512 assertion from one copy of
fat_boot_sector_analyse, it didn't remove it from the other one in the
resizing code. Was this intentional, or is it a mistake? Something
like this seems appropriate given the other changes to that file:
diff --git a/libparted/fs/r/fat/bootsector.c b/libparted/fs/r/fat/bootsector.c
index 1d2b601..683b986 100644
--- a/libparted/fs/r/fat/bootsector.c
+++ b/libparted/fs/r/fat/bootsector.c
@@ -125,18 +125,6 @@ fat_boot_sector_analyse (FatBootSector* bs, PedFileSystem*
fs)
PED_ASSERT (bs != NULL);
- if (PED_LE16_TO_CPU (bs->sector_size) != 512) {
- if (ped_exception_throw (
- PED_EXCEPTION_BUG,
- PED_EXCEPTION_IGNORE_CANCEL,
- _("This file system has a logical sector size of %d. "
- "GNU Parted is known not to work properly with sector "
- "sizes other than 512 bytes."),
- (int) PED_LE16_TO_CPU (bs->sector_size))
- != PED_EXCEPTION_IGNORE)
- return 0;
- }
-
fs_info->logical_sector_size = PED_LE16_TO_CPU (bs->sector_size) / 512;
fs_info->sectors_per_track = PED_LE16_TO_CPU (bs->secs_track);
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [[email protected]]
