On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Antoine Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > I needed to publish xpra to various machines (a combination of amd64 and > i386, old and new versions of Ubuntu) and got tired of compiling from > source every time... (which brings in gazillions of dependencies) > So here is all you should need to get it done quickly: > echo "deb http://xpra.devloop.org.uk/ jaunty main" > \ > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/xpra.list > apt-get update && apt-get install xpra
Awesome! Perhaps you could put instructions for this on the home page (it's a wiki), near where it talks about how to download xpra? > The source is based on a snapshot of xpra from a few weeks ago, with > minor tweaks: > * import sys patch and "--title-suffix" patch (both posted last week) > * bumped version to 0.0.7 to prevent confusion with current release Err... okay. I'll make the next "real" release 0.0.8 then. There are standard ways to do package versions; by the usual rules for .deb's, I think the technically correct options are 0.0.6+YYYYMMDD or 0.0.7~YYYYMMDD (probably the latter, plus of course the package version). See also http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-versions http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version Though if you wanted to fix it at this point, I guess 0.0.8~YYYYMMDD would *actually* be the correct thing, since any new version number would need to be larger than the existing 0.0.7 packages, and the next upstream release *will* be 0.0.8 :-). -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
