On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Dwight Schauer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Nathaniel Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Several people have reported issues with focus failing to be delivered
>> to windows when it is supposed to be. So far I am mystified. (It never
>> seems to happen here, and the logs I've seen seem to show everything
>> working correctly.)
>>
>> Is it any apps in particular that you notice this with?
>
> All apps.
>
>> If it's reliable, can you run the client and server with --debug=all,
>> and send me the output from the client plus the server's
>> ~/.xpra/:<display>.log file?
>
> It is not consistent. Most of the time it just works. If I can find a
> way to reliably repeat it I'll set you logs. This problem is exhibited
> both when it run xpra directly and through freenx. When it starts to
> exhibit the problem I can just grab the title bar and move the window
> a little bit and the problem goes away.
>

Ok, a little more information that may or may not be related.

If I move from an xpra window to another xpra window the focus changes
correctly (and cursors change to indicate that focus change).

However, if I move from xpra window  A to non xpra window B then xpra
window A still beleives it has focus (cursor still indicates focus)
even though non xpra window B really has the focus. None of the
keypresses actually go to xpra window A, even though it still beleives
it still has focus. This behavior is consistent regardless if I'm
using focus follows mouse or click to focus. If I move from non xpra
window B back to xpra window A, then window B shows loss of focus and
keypresses now go into window A again.

The above behavior is consistent when using xpra with xfwm4, metacity,
and compiz.

I'm wondering if this somehow gets xpra's window focusing confused and
causes xpra windows to lose focus altogther.

~Dwight

_______________________________________________
Parti-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss

Reply via email to