-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello,
Sounds great, please send it on! Antoine lars hofhansl wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a relatively clean patch to enable JPEG compression for Xpra. > Is there general interest in that? If so, I'll forward a patch against > Xpra-current to the list. > > The advantages of using jpeg compression are not necessarily obvious. > > In my tests I found that for "text only" traffic (emacs, terminals, etc) the > message sizes sent over the wire actually *increase* > unless a very low quality (with corresponding bad results) is chosen. > > For other traffic like web browsing, the savings are sometimes quite good > (reducing traffic by 25-75%). > For (natural) image intensive application (photo viewer, gimp, etc) traffic > is often reduced by as much as 95%. > (Boh depending on the quality chosen. At quality setting 60 the savings are > quite good). > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Parti-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkp56UQACgkQGK2zHPGK1rvwHgCdFuLs47ca1JvWlmm4gY2oHCHQ HFcAniAOUbw8/3bnXxxJkLteoukb6TIv =mhfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Parti-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.partiwm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parti-discuss
