No difference, which is my point. It would be starting down the slippery slope of creating a version control system from scratch.
Von On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:31 PM, David Collantes <[email protected]> wrote: > What would the difference be? You are still adding and keeping. I do not > use > git with pass. > > -- > Dd > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Password-Store [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Von Welch > > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 14:28 > > To: Jimmy Neutron > > Cc: password-store > > Subject: Re: [pass] generate only first line > > > > +1 to an option to generate a new password and not replace metadata. > > > > -1 to later suggestions to store password history in the metadata, that's > > what git is for. I think writing a script around git to go back and get > > previous passwords is the way to address that. > > > > Von > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Jimmy Neutron <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > As someone who likes to change passwords quite often I really like > the > > generate command. > > But as I prefer to have metadata alongside the password it would be > > really useful if pass would only replace the first line of a passfile if > it > > regenerates an already existing password. > > Otherwise when using generate everything else in the passfile would > be > > deleted. > > _______________________________________________ > > Password-Store mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
