On 23 Jun 2014, at 21:27, [email protected] wrote:
On 2014-06-22 18:37, Dmitry Samsonov wrote :
> I use encfs for that.
> http://www.arg0.net/encfs
> I think this is more unix-way than integration that functionality
with
> pass.
Wouldn't it be best to have this functionality more integrated with
the tool?
Using a single file per item has the advantage of shell completion,
using version control, browse, move and rename the items in a file
browser, edit them in a regular editor (that does GPG, or manually run
GPG first), etc.
If you want an encrypted index then you take this away, and you
introduce a dependency in the file system (on this index), so it seems
like it would be better/easier to just move to a single (encrypted)
database, but there are already alternative password managers that work
like that.
_______________________________________________
Password-Store mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
