I see that `pass` is more advanced than what I initially thought. It allows several people to have access to passwords, and they all can synchronize through git.
So, replacing asymmetric encryption with symmetric encription is not an option. However I still think that *both* of them can be supported, and the user can choose which one is more suitable for him. And actually this will not make the script more complicated, but hopefully simpler. I have already started to work on it. The first step was to factor out the encrypt and decript commands: https://github.com/dashohoxha/password-store/commit/af32b5c8c863a3245b6a3bd752f503f768033361 Please check it out, for code review and to make sure that I am not missing something. Thanks, Dashamir On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Lenz Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > Or you use two different keys for a directory. > > > pass init -p subdir keyid1 keyid2 > > now both people can read it > > Am 24.01.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Christoph Egger: > > Hi! > > > > Aleksandr Pasechnik <[email protected]> writes: > >> How does the key sharing work? > > > > You can use a different, shared key for some subdirectories > > We're doing this a lot here > > > > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > > Password-Store mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store > > > _______________________________________________ > Password-Store mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store >
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
