On 08/11/16 21:08, Lucas Hoffmann wrote: > I also tried to kick off a discussion about parsable output some time > ago (should be in the archive) but with no big results :( >
I think the current stance is that the backing format of the repository is well defined and simple, so there is little value gained from re-implementing all the unix tools through the pass frontend. The pass tool was designed to be used by humans and if you want to script access/management/whatever of the password store just ignore the frontend and access the underlying directory directly. I'm not saying that it is the best stance (very little abstraction) but I think it's fairly reasonable given the simplicity of the problem and solution. TL;DR We don't need `pass ls --raw` because we have `ls -1` Cheers, Kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
