On 05/04, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > and a non zero chance that it will generate "password1234" that > doesn't mean accepting that is a good idea though, one also has to > consider likely attack strategies. > > the example given is likely fine, but if you randomly get a password > that you think is bad, regeneration is always an option.
Given the fact that the chance of that happening is the same as an attacker guessing your password on the first try, you can safely ignore this possibility. And be careful with regenerating passwords based on random criteria, it does introduce bias. -- PGP ID: 0xC8F0B2F4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
