You really want to sacrifice native desktop integration (with gpg-agent and desktop key ring) just because gpg is not very loved? I don't think most of Linux/Unix users would like that! If you don't have password on your private key, or you have a very short password, you are probably making a mistake.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:08 PM Allan Odgaard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 Sep 2019, at 12:24, Allan Odgaard wrote: > > Sure, if we re-implement the features currently being used from GPG, > switching to an alternative would go unnoticed :) > > But that feature list also includes key management, for example teams may > encrypt passwords for multiple recipients and/or with different keys for > different sub-folders. > > It turns out that gopass re-implements GPG including key storage as an > alternative backend, so you can see what is involved here: > https://github.com/gopasspw/gopass/tree/master/pkg/backend/crypto/xc > > They use protocol buffers as the “file format” (when using this backend). > _______________________________________________ > Password-Store mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store >
_______________________________________________ Password-Store mailing list [email protected] https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/password-store
