On 06.02.2021 00:42, Steve Gilberd wrote: > I just use symlinks. Works perfectly, no hassle. > > I don't really feel a need to integrate an alias command, considering ln -s > works just fine already. But I have no objection to that kind of > abstraction either; I can see why it might appeal.
I'm happy to create symbolic links myself though aliases handled by pass would have additional benefits: - one could argue that insert/edit/mv/cp/rm commands are redundant because you can just go create files/directories, move or copy them. it's simply more convenient to have dedicated command - while it could create symbolic links at first, it might as well change behavior later on to ie support systems without symbolic links, however for user change would be transparent - in case `alias` implementation changes it could also handle migration process again transparently for the end user
