"Jason A. Donenfeld" <[email protected]> writes: > Good thinking. Patch applied.
Thanks! > I suppose you're considering swapping out gpg with sequoia and hoping > pass still works? Indeed, I'm working on a re-implementation of the gpg interface. As part of that work, I'm using downstream test suites to verify my implementation and to exercise various corners of the argument space. https://gitlab.com/sequoia-pgp/sequoia-chameleon-gnupg I'm happy to report that with the patch applied, the pass test suite passes with my implementation. That doesn't mean that it is recommended to use it now, this is still early work. Best, Justus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
