Randy McMurchy wrote: > Archaic wrote these words on 08/21/05 12:16 CST: > >>On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:02:41AM -0500, William Harrington wrote: >> >> >>>Submitted By: William Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>Patches should be discussed on blfs-dev for implementation. The BLFS >>editors are the ones who put in BLFS patches, not the patches project >>maintainers. > > > This is simply not true. Any patch can be submitted to the LFS > Patches project and should be put in the repo. It is up to Editors > to *decide* if they want to *use* a patch in their respective books. > > There are many, many patches in the repo that are not in any of > the books.
I think you guys are both right. Any patch can be submitted to the patch project. Certain patches that may be appropriate to BLFS should be discussed in blfs-dev. Right now there is a discussion of a patch for LFS about iputils in lfs-dev. This is as is should be. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/patches FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
