Patches item #1163731, was opened at 2005-03-15 09:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rhettinger You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1163731&group_id=5470
Category: Core (C code) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Michael Hudson (mwh) Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Summary: small sanity checks for user-defined mros Initial Comment: I the course of looking at bug 1153075 (which is a nastier problem) I found a couple of sillies: no checking was done that a user defined mro() function returns a sequence or that said sequence contains types or classes. This patch fixes this, at least, and I'd like to get it into 2.4.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) Date: 2005-03-16 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Are you sure to want to backport this directly to a release candidate without it having lived on the head for a while? Seems a little dangerous at this stage for something that is arguably not actually broken right now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh) Date: 2005-03-15 09:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6656 Argh, this is what I meant to upload. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1163731&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
