Patches item #1216942, was opened at 2005-06-08 05:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fdrake You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1216942&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Foord (mjfoord) >Assigned to: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Summary: Suggested Additional Material for urllib2 docs Initial Comment: This is some suggested additional material for the urllib2 docs. Particularly the part about error codes and the reason/code attributes of error objects is *missing* from the manual and needed. Also the example showing basic Authentication using password manager/handler/opener may help avoid some confusion. Alternatively you can link to my online tutorials at http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/articles.shtml#http :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2005-12-22 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 I'll TeXify. I agree with John about reproducing the response code listing; that's a good place to simply defer to the HTTP spec. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John J Lee (jjlee) Date: 2005-12-04 15:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=261020 I'm sure doc improvements are welcome here, so thank you :) However, I think you need to 1) split this up into small patches that address very specific issues, and briefly justify each change in the patch submission note on the SF patch tracker 2) present the patches by editing the original .tex source files from src/Doc/lib and then running 'diff -u' or 'svn diff' (it doesn't matter if you can't compile the docs or get the TeX markup wrong, just as long as everybody can see exactly what the intended changes to the text are) Also, one thing that caught my eye on a very brief scan was that the actual response code->name mapping (rather than a note to document the existence of that mapping) shouldn't be reproduced in the docs, I think. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1216942&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
