Patches item #1504046, was opened at 2006-06-10 09:30
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by nnorwitz
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1504046&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Documentation
Group: Python 2.5
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Lundh (effbot)
>Assigned to: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Summary: Rough documentation for xml.etree.ElementTree

Initial Comment:
Here's a text version (based on the existing PythonDoc
documentation).  Feel free to grab it and convert it to
Latex.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2006-07-09 19:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

I left it as it is which I think is xml.etree.  I don't know
which is correct, but at least we have something in svn that
is better than nothing.  Feel free to change it to whatever
you want.

Thanks Engelbert.

Committed revision 50506.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: engelbert gruber (grubert)
Date: 2006-06-30 04:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=147070

http://members.chello.at/engelbert.gruber/python/elementtree
-docpy.tar.gz

contains the modified (for docpy-writer) documentation and 
a translation into latex.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Date: 2006-06-10 12:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3066

There's an open question on whether this should be
documented as xml.etree or xmlcore.etree.

With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5,
should we document xml.etree or xmlcore.etree?  If someone
installs PyXML with Python 2.5, I don't think they're going
to get xml.etree, which will be really confusing.  We can be
sure that xmlcore.etree will be there.

I'd rather not propogate the pain caused "xml" package
insanity any further.

Posted also to python-dev:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065816.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1504046&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches

Reply via email to