Patches item #1494140, was opened at 2006-05-24 18:26 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by quiver You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1494140&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation Group: Python 2.5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Documentation for new Struct object Initial Comment: The performance enhancements to the struct module (patch #1493701) are implemented by having a Struct object, which is a compiled structure. This text file documents these new struct objects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: George Yoshida (quiver) Date: 2006-07-11 02:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=671362 Patch for the TeX style doc. Bob, can you work on updating the main section right after 2.5 b2? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum) Date: 2006-05-26 22:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=139309 We're going to need to revise this patch some more to document the new pack_to function (for Martin Blais' hotbuf work) Additionally we'll probably also want to revise the main struct documentation to talk about bounds checking and avoiding the creation of long objects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum) Date: 2006-05-25 23:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=139309 That's clearly a typo. I've attached a new version of the patch that removes those two letters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Jewett (jimjjewett) Date: 2006-05-25 06:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=764593 Shouldn't self.size be the number of bytes required to *pack * the structure? The number required to *unpack* seems like it ought to include tuple overhead and such... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum) Date: 2006-05-25 00:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=139309 New patch attached, fixed unpack documentation, added unpack_from method. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Ippolito (etrepum) Date: 2006-05-24 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=139309 Hold up on this patch, I need to revise it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1494140&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list Patches@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
