Patches item #1513299, was opened at 2006-06-27 12:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gbrandl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1513299&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Library (Lib) >Group: Python 2.6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Collin Winter (collinwinter) Assigned to: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Summary: Clean up usage of map() in the stdlib Initial Comment: This patch cleans up the usage of map() in the standard library. Among other things, it removes several usages of things like map(None, x), as well as simplifying a number of map(lambda: ..., x) expressions. This patch is against r47124. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl) Date: 2006-08-14 22:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=849994 Can wait until 2.6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) Date: 2006-07-25 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29957 map(None, ...) should definitely be expunged. The others should be addressed on a case-by-case basis. I'll have a read-through of the patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Collin Winter (collinwinter) Date: 2006-06-27 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1344176 Updated the patch to r47131 and added a bunch of new cleanups. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Jewett (jimjjewett) Date: 2006-06-27 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=764593 There are none I would suggest reverting; it is just that some are clear wins and others are not so important. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Collin Winter (collinwinter) Date: 2006-06-27 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1344176 Which ones would you like to see reverted (ie, which ones are not an improvement)? I've found some more cases that can be improved, so a new version of the patch will be on the way shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Jewett (jimjjewett) Date: 2006-06-27 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=764593 Some cases are definately an improvement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1513299&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list Patches@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
