Patches item #1547796, was opened at 2006-08-28 10:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gbrandl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1547796&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Core (C code)
Group: Python 3000
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Summary: set literals

Initial Comment:
A rough patch implementing {1, 2, 3}-style set literals.
There is no empty set literal.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-08-28 16:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849994

Okay, fixed the symtable issue.

Hopefully other people also do weird things with the new
syntax, the unit tests aren't very thorough (yet).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2006-08-28 15:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6380

Committed revision 51631.


despite two (related?) flaws:

(1)
../Python/symtable.c: In function `symtable_visit_expr':
../Python/symtable.c:1209: warning: enumeration value
`Set_kind' not handled in switch

(2)
>>> {(x for x in range(10))}
KeyError: 'unknown symbol table entry'
>>> 

(Don't ask me why that was the third thing I tried with the
new syntax. :-)

Also, I'd love set comprehensions!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1547796&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches

Reply via email to