Patches item #1548082, was opened at 2006-08-28 13:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gvanrossum
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1548082&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Core (C code)
Group: Python 3000
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "for x in setliteral" peepholer optimization
Initial Comment:
Like "for x in tuple_or_list", this patch rewrites "for
x in set" to use a constant frozenset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2006-08-29 14:24
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6380
Um, "for x in [1,2,3]" doesn't get any treatment. What would
be the point of writing "for x in {1,2,3}" anyway?
I'd rather reject this as premature optimization.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1548082&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
