Patches item #1641544, was opened at 2007-01-22 06:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rockyb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1641544&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Library (Lib) Group: Python 2.6 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Stephen Emslie (stephenemslie) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: rlcompleter tab completion in pdb Initial Comment: By default, Pdb and other instances of Cmd complete names for their commands. However in the context of pdb, I think it is more useful to complete identifiers and keywords in its current scope than to complete names of commands (most of which have single letter abbreviations). I believe this makes pdb a far more usable introspection tool. I have discussed this proposal on the python-ideas list: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2007-January/000084.html This patch implements the following: - creates an rlcompleter instance on Pdb if readline is available - adds a 'complete' method to the Pdb class. The only difference with rlcompleter's default behaviour is that is also updates rlcompleter's namespace to reflect the current local and global namespace, which is necessary because pdb changes scope as it steps through a program This is a patch against python/Lib/pdb.py rev. 51745 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Rocky Bernstein (rockyb) Date: 2007-01-27 21:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=158581 Originator: NO I experimented with this a little in the pydb variant (http://bashdb.sf.net/pydb). Some observations. First, one can include the debugger commands into the namespace without too much trouble. See what's checked into CVS for pydb; In particular look at the complete method of pydbbdb. (Personally, I think adding debugger commands to the list of completions is a little more honest.) The second problem I have is that completion is not all that sensitive to the preceding context. If the line begins "step" or "1 + ", is it really correct to list all valid symbols? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1641544&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list Patches@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
