Patches item #1448297, was opened at 2006-03-12 14:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loewis You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1448297&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Modules Group: Python 2.5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: decorator module Initial Comment: This is a first attempt to a decorator standard module containing only @decorator in a C implementation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) Date: 2007-02-15 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=21627 Originator: NO Why does this implementation have to be in C? I can't see any performance reason - this is all import-time stuff, and not computationally expensive, no? I'm otherwise fine with adding it to 2.6 (perhaps with a reference in the Python implementation where the C version is stored -ie in this issue- in case anybody ever wants to do this in C again). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1448297&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list Patches@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
