Patches item #1667546, was opened at 2007-02-23 18:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gvanrossum
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1667546&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Core (C code)
Group: Python 2.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul Boddie (pboddie)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Time zone-capable variant of time.localtime

Initial Comment:
Patch related to #1493676: "time.strftime() %z error"

This provides a localtime_tz function whose return value is the usual localtime 
time tuple with an additional field reflecting the underlying tm_gmtoff data. 
Various internal function signatures are modified to support the flow of time 
zone information, with the gettmarg most noticably changed (probably quite 
inelegantly - I don't do Python core development).

This patch is against the Python 2.4.4 release sources.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2007-03-02 10:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6380
Originator: NO

Without even looking at the patch, IMO it would be much better to add
tm_gmtoff and tm_zone (and any other fields) to the record returned by
localtime(), but in such a way that when accessed as a tuple it still has
only 9 fields.  There is infrastructure for doing so somewhere for the stat
structure that I'm sure could be borrowed or generalized (if it isn't
already general).  That's much better than adding a new function.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1667546&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches

Reply via email to