Patches item #1675951, was opened at 2007-03-07 18:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lucas_malor
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1675951&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Modules
Group: Python 2.6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: [gzip] Performance for small reads and fix seek problem
Initial Comment:
This patch improves read performance of the gzip module. We have seen
improvments from 20% from reading big blocks up to factor 50 for reading 4 byte
blocks. Additionally this patch removes the need of seeking within the file
with allows using streams like stdin as input.
Details:
The whole read(),readline() stack got rewritten. Core part is a new input
buffer. It consists of a list of strings (self.buffer), an offset of what has
already be consumed from the first string (self.pos) and the length of the
(still consumable) buffer (self.bufferlen). This makes adding to and removing
from the buffer cheap. It turned out that removing from the old buffer was
breaking performance as for reading one byte the whole buffer had to be copied.
For reading a 2k buffer in single bytes 2MB had to be copied.
readline no longer uses read() but directly works on the buffer. This removes a
whole layer of copying strings together.
For removing the need of seeking a new readonly filelike class is used
(PaddedFile). It just prepends a string to a file and uses the file's read
method when the string got used up.
There is probably still some space for tweaking when it comes to buffere sizes
as we kept this simple. But the great performance improvments show that we
can't be off that much.
Performance test program and results are attached.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Lucas Malor (lucas_malor)
Date: 2007-03-15 19:30
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1403274
Originator: NO
I applied the patch by hand, I think the problem is simply it's for python
2.6 (I have the stable 2.5 version)
Anyway like I wrote for an old similar patch of another user, the patch
starts to read the header at the current position, and not at the start of
the file. You can see it trying this piece of code:
---------------------------------------
import urllib2
import array
import gzip
urlfile = urllib2.urlopen(someurl)
header = array.array("B")
header.fromstring(urlfile.read(1))
gzfile = gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=urlfile)
print gzfile.read()
-----------------------------------------
Error:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
File "c:\My Programs\Python\lib\gzip.py", line 285, in read
self._read_gzip_header(self.fileobj)
File "c:\My Programs\Python\lib\gzip.py", line 177, in
_read_gzip_header
raise IOError, 'Not a gzipped file'
IOError: Not a gzipped file
>Exit code: 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know how you can solve this without seek()
Anyway if you are interested I created the diff for Python 2.5 :
http://digilander.libero.it/LucasMalor/gzip_2.5.py.diff.gz
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Date: 2007-03-15 18:43
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1736372
Originator: YES
Hm, works one Linux.
Try this one
File Added: gzip.py.diff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Lucas Malor (lucas_malor)
Date: 2007-03-15 17:42
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1403274
Originator: NO
Excuse me, but I can't apply the patch. I have Windows XP without any SP
and I tried to do the command
patch -u gzip.py gzip.py.diff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Date: 2007-03-09 10:24
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1736372
Originator: YES
I added checks to test_readline() and test_append(). I left the other read
test untouched to keep some filename=filename coverage.
BTW: I really forgot special thanks for Phil Knirsch who wrote the initial
read() implementation and the performance test cases and did a lot of
weaking and testing and without whom this patch would never have existed.
File Added: test_gzip.py-noseek.diff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2007-03-08 21:58
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
Originator: NO
The patch looks good, and the tests pass. Can you add a test that ensures
that a seek() method is not necessary any more for the underlying stream?
(closed #914340 which provided a similar patch as duplicate)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Date: 2007-03-07 19:24
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1736372
Originator: YES
Added minor improvement of the unittest: Check for newlines in the
readline() test code.
File Added: test_gzip.py.diff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Date: 2007-03-07 19:01
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1736372
Originator: YES
File Added: results.txt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Florian Festi (florianfesti)
Date: 2007-03-07 18:58
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1736372
Originator: YES
File Added: test_gzip2.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1675951&group_id=5470
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
