Patches item #1727209, was opened at 2007-05-28 22:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gvanrossum You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1727209&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core (C code) Group: Python 3000 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) Summary: First steps towards new super (PEP 367) Initial Comment: A half-assed start of an implementation for super. This is lacking parser support; instead, for now, you have to have a keyword-only argument named super, e.g. def foo(self, arg, *, super): return super.foo(arg) + 1 Note that the first version changes method lookup for bound method lookup but not yet for unbound method lookup. E.g. if f is defined in class B, and class C derives from B, C().f returns a bound method object whose im_class attribute is set to B (as opposed to C as it used to be) but C.f returns an unbound method object with im_class set to C. (I hope to this in a later version.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) Date: 2007-05-28 22:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6380 Originator: YES Here is sup.py, a small demo of how this is supposed to work. File Added: sup.py ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1727209&group_id=5470 _______________________________________________ Patches mailing list Patches@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/patches