Paulo Ricardo Stradioti wrote:
Why not adding an F: with a configurable message? Each network can set
their own polices regarding it...
Although it has been sent with a different subject/thread, I'm assuming
this message was directed at me.
I'm not sure I'm following you - what do you mean by "an F:" ? By the
way, the URL in the string can already be configured with the latest
patch submission.
Regards,
--
*Jeannot Langlois*
B. Sc. Computer Science / B. Sc. Informatique
Software Developer / Programmeur-Analyste
System/Network Administrator / Administrateur Système/Réseau
*jeannot12 AT linuxmail DOT org
*icq : 1-5-2-6-2-8-9-1
msn : jeannot12 AT hotmail DOT com
LINUX_LOGO <http://jbtserver.sourceforge.net/gif/logo_linux.gif>
Vous recherchez ou voulez offrir un transport de/vers
l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue (Québec)?
Cliquez sur la boîte ci-dessous...
Looking for or offering a ride to/from the Abitibi-Temiscamingue
(Quebec) area?
Click on the box below...
Covoiturage Rouyn-Noranda <http://covoiturage-rn.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/patches
