Hi Jeremy, On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 08:42 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > Hi Guilherme, > > > We're going to use Patchwork to track Linaro patches, but instead of > > subscribing to all mailing lists to which patches may be sent, we're > > asking all Linaro developers to CC a common email address whenever they > > send a patch upstream, and we'll then feed all mail delivered to that > > address into Patchwork. > > I don't see the reasoning for doing this - it's more work (once-off setup vs > getting every contributor to do stuff repeatedly) and less reliable > (contributors may forget to add the magic address, or not know about this > requirement).
Maybe I wasn't clear, but this is not to track patches sent to Linaro; what we want is to track patches sent upstream by engineers working for Linaro. It already is the company's policy that all patches sent upstream should be CCed to this magic address, and feeding that address' mailbox to patchwork.linaro.org seemed like a better alternative than continuously having to subscribe patchwork.l.o to the mailing lists of all different projects that Linaro engineers may contribute to (we don't have a list of all these projects beforehand and we expect it to grow all the time). Cheers, -- Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
