Em 30-03-2011 08:56, Alasdair G Kergon escreveu: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:28:18PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote: >> However (as you say in your second point), all maintainers currently have >> permissions to edit the state of all patches. To deal with this, it would be >> feasible to (set by a per-project flag) allow non-lead maintainers to update >> only the patches that are delegated to them. >> I'm not totally convinced that this is necessary though; do you not trust >> your >> sub-maintainers to refrain from editing patches that they shouldn't? > > Rather than going down the "we don't trust you to change this state" > route, personally I'd prefer to see an option to display the state > history: who changed state from what to what and when.
As I said, it is not a matter of trust/not trust, but when there are lots of sub-maintainers, it is better to have some coordination. Yet, the idea of having a state change history sounds very nice to me. > > Alasdair > > _______________________________________________ > Patchwork mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
